List of areas disputed by Canada and the United
States
Although
Canada and the United States share the longest border between two countries,
there is a long history of disputes about the border's demarcation.
Current
disputes
Machias Seal Island (about 8.1 ha (20 acres)) and North Rock
(Maine / New Brunswick), located in what is known as the "Grey Zone"
(about 717 km2 (277 sq mi) in size),[2] is occupied by a Canadian lighthouse
but claimed by the United States and visited by U.S. tour boats. The area is
patrolled by the Canadian Coast Guard. The unresolved maritime boundary breaks
into two elements: the sovereignty of the island and the location of the
maritime boundary taking into account who is the rightful owner of the island.[3]
Strait of Juan de Fuca (Washington / British Columbia): At
the mouth of the strait, both countries declared fishing zones in 1977. Each
country used a mildly differing method to define an equidistant water boundary.
The two separate water areas in dispute amount to about 51.5 km2 (19.9 sq
mi).[3]
Yukon–Alaska dispute, Beaufort Sea (Alaska / Yukon) Canada supports an
extension into the sea of the land boundary between Yukon and Alaska. The U.S.
does not, but instead supports an extended sea boundary into the Canadian
portion of the Beaufort Sea. Such a demarcation means that a minor portion of
Northwest Territories EEZ in the polar region is claimed by Alaska, because the
EEZ boundary between Northwest Territories and Yukon follows a straight
north-south line into the sea. The U.S. claims would create a triangular shaped
EEZ for Yukon/Canada.[4] The disputed area is about 21,440 km2 (8,280 sq mi) in
size.[3] The precise translation of a phrase in the Anglo-Russian Convention of
1825, which was written in French, is part of the issue. The convention makes
reference to the 141st Meridian "in its prolongation as far as the Frozen
ocean." The authentic text is in French: "dans son [sic] prolongation
jusqu’à la Mer Glaciale."[3] The precise question is the interpretation
that should be given to the preposition "jusqu’à." Specifically, is
it inclusive or exclusive of the object to which the preposition relates?[3]
Northwest Passage: Canada claims the passage as part of its
"internal waters" belonging to Canada, while the United States
regards it as an "international strait" (a strait accommodating open
international traffic). The Canadian Coast Guard and Royal Canadian Navy have
commissioned a new ice breaker along with multiple offshore patrol ships to
guard and patrol the waters.
Dixon Entrance (Alaska / British Columbia) contains two water
areas that are mutually claimed by Canada and the U.S. A line known as the
"A-B" Line[3] was defined in a 1903 arbitration decision on the
Alaska/Canada boundary.[5] The court specified the initial boundary point
(Point "A") at the northern end of Dixon Entrance[6] and also
designated Point "B" 72 NM to the east.[7] Canada relies on the
"A-B" line as rendering nearly all of Dixon Entrance as its internal
waters. The U.S. does not recognize the "A-B" line as an official
boundary, instead regarding it as allocating sovereignty over the land masses
within the Dixon Entrance,[3] with Canada's land south of the line. The U.S.
regards the waters as subject to international marine law, and in 1977 it
defined an equidistant territorial line throughout Dixon Entrance, mainly to
the south of the "A-B" line.[3][8] The intersecting lines create four
separate water areas with differing claim status. The two areas south of the "A-B"
line (about 2,789 km2 (1,077 sq mi) and 51.5 km2 (19.9 sq mi) in size) are
claimed by both countries. The other two water areas are north of the
"A-B" line and are not claimed by either country. The two unclaimed
areas are about 72 km2 (28 sq mi) and 1.4 km2 (0.5 sq mi) in size.[3] In
addition, Nunez Rocks is a low-tide elevation ("bare at
half-tide"[9]) that lies south of the "A-B" Line, surrounded by
the sea territory claimed by the U.S.[3] The United States has not ratified the
Law of the Sea Treaty, although it adheres to most of its principles as
customary international law. Under the treaty, LTEs may be used as basepoints
for a territorial sea, and the U.S. uses Nunez Rocks as a basepoint. As a
non-signatory, however, there is nothing preventing the U.S. from claiming
areas beyond the scope of the Law of the Sea Treaty. The fact remains that, for
about half of each day, above-water territory that Canada regards as Canadian
is surrounded by sea territory that the U.S. has declared to be American.
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento